Scrapbooking

12 pages
8 views

EROS and Civilization: Sexuality and the Contemporary International Art Cinema

of 12
All materials on our website are shared by users. If you have any questions about copyright issues, please report us to resolve them. We are always happy to assist you.
Share
Description
EROS and Civilization: Sexuality and the Contemporary International Art Cinema
Transcript
  Articles Eros and Civilization 28 | lm internationalissue 36 In our age of globalization , it is oten assumedthat the distinctive thematic and aesthetic con-cerns o major international lm auteurs maybe homogenized and/or sublated into some sorto ‘universal’ orm o expression, apart romthe national identity and localized cinematictraditions rom which they derive. In such anera, nationwide and regional customs andpractices, including erotic mores, might alsobecome ‘homogenized’ under the regime o anintercontinental cinematic style. The lures o  Eros and Civilization:  Sexuality and theContemporaryInternationalArt Cinema By Frank P. Tomasulo   Keywords:   Eros (2004),Michelangelo Antonioni, Wong Kar-Wai, Steven Soderbergh,eroticism in lm, anthologylms, nudity, national cinema  Articles Eros and Civilization   www.lmint.nu  | 29  the worldwide box oce and global prestige aretwo other actors that might lead to a one-size-ts-all mentality or contemporary lm-makers.It is thereore important to keep in mind thatthe question o national cinema and nationalidentity – what Siegried Kracauer called‘national character’ in reerence to WeimarGermany (Kracauer 1947: 8) – must always bestudied in the context o larger global, histori-cal and artistic determinants. In particular, therole o the erotic impulse in a given civilization’scharacter and cinema must likewise be inves-tigated within a broader system o custom andrepresentation. For example, are there interna-tional erotic practices that transcend nationalboundaries and belies? I Eskimos kiss withtheir noses, as the popular myth goes, what doesit mean i a French couple does the same? Moreimportant to this discussion, what does it meani that French couple kisses with their noses onscreen ? I devotees o certain religions expecttheir women (and occasionally their men) to bemodest in dress and demeanour (at least in pub-lic), what does that say about a culture’s erotica?One way to investigate these complex sexualphenomena is through an examination o international co-productions, particularly ‘port-manteau’ or ‘anthology’ lms, what the Frenchcall  flms à sketch , which suture together thedirectorial eorts o ‘star’ lm-makers romdierent countries around a common theme:love in the city, the Vietnam War, 9/11, etc. This‘quasi-genre’, i it can be called that, has a long and mixed history that fourished most notice-ably in the European art cinema o the 190s: Love at Twenty  / L’Amour à vingt ans (192), TheSeven Deadly Sins  / Les Sept pêchés capiteaux (192), Far rom Vietnam  / Loin de Viet Nam (197) and Spirits o the Dead (198), to name just a ew.In particular, Eros (2004), a cosmopolitanomnibus lm directed by Wong Kar-Wai,Steven Soderbergh and Michelangelo Anto- ‘Eros was assembled with the express purpose o being atribute to the career o the now-deceased co-director andcinematic maestro Michelangelo Antonioni by auteurs whohave been infuenced by his reinvention o lm eroticismand his distinctive cinematic style.’ Below The couple  Articles Eros and Civilization 0 | lm internationalissue 36 nioni respectively, can be interrogated ortraces o distinct national themes and semi-otic styles, as well as more globalized con-cerns that pertain to sexuality in our times.The idea is to suggest the complex natureo dening a specic constellation o lmsas a national cinema in an age o  both thecultural specicity o the nation state (andsemi-autonomous regions) and the worldwideamalgamation o such cultural ormationsunder globalization. Is there an internationalmodernist style o cinema (as there was, orinstance, in architecture), or do Hong Kong,American and Italian auteurs make very di-erent movies? Likewise, is there an interna-tional style o sexuality, or does each nation– and every lm-maker – have a uniqueway o representing contemporary Eros?Some background inormation: Eros wasassembled with the express purpose o being a tribute to the career o the now-deceasedco-director and cinematic maestro Michel-angelo Antonioni by auteurs who have beeninfuenced by his reinvention o lm eroti-cism and his distinctive cinematic style.Antonioni’s depictions o the sexual malaiseo the 190s were clearly congruent with theviews o psychoanalyst Erik Erikson, whosebooks were largely responsible or the 190s(and 1990s) vogue o ‘identity’. Erikson notedthat ‘the patient o early psychoanalysis su-ered most under sexual inhibitions whichprevented him rom [attaining his identity]’(Erikson 19: 279). By contrast, the contem-porary patient was constrained not by sexualrepression but, according to Christopher Lasch, ‘In particular, the role o the erotic impulse in a givencivilization’s character and cinema must likewise beinvestigated within a broader system o custom andrepresentation.’ Below Staring at the sea  Articles Eros and Civilization   www.lmint.nu  | 1  by narcissism (Lasch 1979). Overtly charm-ing and successul, he/she is socially andsexually promiscuous as a way o avoiding close involvements. As a result, compulsivecopulation becomes perunctory and ster-ile: no longer a blissul pleasure shared bytwo (or more) people; rather, sex had becomea sel-indulgence or solitary monads.Herbert Marcuse oered a similar diagnosis.He pointed out that images o sexual grati-cation that had such an explosive negativeorce in Victorian society have been harnessed– in a post-industrial societé de consomma-tion that no longer needs the social cemento sexual taboo – to the service o the statusquo and consumerism (ater all, ‘sex sells’).Marcuse called this modern phenomenon‘repressive desublimation’ (Marcuse 194:72–79). In line with Erikson, Lasch and Mar-cuse, Antonioni’s clinical cinema was oteninterested less in the personal  psychology o love and sexuality than in the social  phenom-enology o contemporary erotic behaviour.These same issues are part and parcel o the cinematic world o  Eros , particularly thethree directors’ portrayal o the ‘sexual cri-sis’ o the modern libidinal apparatus (Lepro-hon 1972: 18). And, indeed, in very dierentways and in dierent historical periods, Wong,Soderbergh and Antonioni all address ac-ets o the ongoing global dialectics o sex.Originally, Pedro Almodovar was to havebeen one o the three lm-makers, along with Wong Kar-wai and Antonioni him-sel, but his schedule would not permit itso Steven Soderbergh was substituted. Eros  was a co-production o Fandango Films,Section Eight Ltd. and Solaris Cinemata-graca, and was one o the rst movies tobe distributed under the banner o WarnerBrothers’ nascent art-house division, War-ner Independent Pictures. It grossed a veryanaemic $188,000 in the United States. ‘The Hand’ The rst part o this trilogy – or should it becalled a ménage-à-trois ? – is ‘The Hand/Shoˇu/ 手 ’,directed by Wong Kar-Wai. As usual, the direc-tor’s perennial themes o time, love and loss areon display, all within the context o the evolv-ing socio-political context o his native Hong Kong, a British colony in the time rame o the lm. In particular, ‘The Hand’ is a noctur-nal chamber piece about the unrequited loveo an apprentice tailor or his most-treasuredclient, Miss Hua (Gong Li), a stylish Hong Kong courtesan o the mid-190s, a period whenancient traditions gave way to modernist sen-sibilities, particularly in the arena o sex. Overthe course o many years, the timid but besot-ted tailor, Xiao Zhang (Chang Chen), lovinglycrats the clothing that this sophisticated yetunattainable woman wears or other men.From the opening image, the directorcreates a milieu o loud, heavy rain, long empty hallways and silk sheath dresses – averitable lmic phenomenology o roman-tic places, textures and tapestries. Indeed,the rst shot portrays a Rashomon -likerainstorm that enguls the shabby PalaceHotel and surrounding waterront neigh-bourhood in which Miss Hua now lives.Inside Miss Hua’s room, however, it isquiet. She asks Zhang to remember whenthey rst met and that triggers the fash-back that is most o the rest o the lm.We rst see an empty stairwell in a ash-ionable apartment building – an obvioushomage to Antonioni’s concern with archi-tectural spaces – as the shy tailor asks ordirections to Apartment #1, Miss Hua’s abode.The courtesan keeps the virginal tailor wait-ing at this rst meeting while she pantsloudly o-screen in the course o servic-ing a wealthy customer in the next room.Zhang puts his hand on his orehead in asubtle gesture o embarrassment. Whenshe nally deigns to summon him into herbedroom, the camera holds on the décor o the waiting room well ater Zhang leavesthe room, another tribute to Antonioni.Once in her domain, Miss Hua tells Zhang that he cannot understand how to dressa woman without some sexual experi-ence. So, she orders him to take o histrousers and underpants and then initi-ates him into the world o the erotic byhand. She then dismisses him abruptlywith an injunction, ‘Remember this eeling … and you’ll make me beautiul clothes.’Although the shots o her bright-red pol-ished ngernails against the back o Zhang’supper thighs can be construed as erotic in a  Articles Eros and Civilization 2 | lm internationalissue 36 detached kind o way, this is not a particu-larly explicit sequence; indeed, its restraintis apparent, given the more overt orms o sexuality that have dominated internationalscreens in recent decades. Even when thewoman caresses his ass and testicles (caus-ing him to wince), the camera ocuses onZhang’s ace. Wong seems to take moredelight in the sublime subtlety o his shim-mering, highly composed romantic imagesand subtle editing rhythms (along with theaccompanying elegant classical string music)than in the actual depiction o this (par-don my language) hand job. Again, Zhang isembarrassed, on the verge o tears, even atthe moment o climax. That event is shot intight close-up on his ace or over orty sec-onds and then we cut to her reaction shotand, nally, the eggplant-coloured walls.In act, throughout ‘The Hand’, Wong seems to etishize elegant clothing, décor(curtains, lamps, eggplant-coloured walls,fowers and vases), and languid cameramovements – mainly through highly com-posed shots that are held on-screen muchlonger than necessary to make their nar-rative points, but that allow the specta-tor to contemplate the thematic relevanceo the ravishing imagery, a techniqueoten used by Antonioni in his heyday.The vacant stairwell o Miss Hua’s build-ing, seen throughout Wong’s segment, imme-diately ollows the hand-job scene – a visualcorrelative or the ultimate emptiness o theexperience, one that is worthy o Antonioni’sediting and use o ‘dead space’ in lms rom The Adventure  / L’Avventura (190) to Identifca-tion o a Woman  / Identifcazione di una donna  (1982). Although this mise-en-scène o pur-poselessness conveys the alienation o thedispassionate act, Zhang immediately allsin love or lie with his sexual mentor. Heexpresses this aection mainly through thebeautiul gowns and colourul dresses hemakes or her over the ensuing decades.In addition to empty architectural spaces,Wong also uses barrier images, also associ-ated with Antonioni’s cinema, to emphasizethe alienation between characters or to visu-ally hem in a person by constricting his/herspace. In one shot, the tailor is seen in hisshop, working on Miss Hua’s gowns, visu-ally and emotionally conned by his wist-ul, unspoken and exclusive yearning or anunresponsive woman and by his devotionto a trade he chose in order to stay in touchwith her. Again, Zhang’s dormant sexuality isconveyed visually – and through the actor’ssubtle, poker-aced expressions that ambigu-ously portray his latent male masochism.Antonioni once reerred to Eclipse/L’Eclisse  (192) as ‘a story o imprisoned sentiments’(Gilman 192: 10), and Wong Kar-Wai ol-lows in that tradition. Both his characters aretrapped – literally and guratively – in theirrespective situations. Barricades, ences andarchitectural structures visually oregroundtheir predicaments throughout ‘The Hand’.Furthermore, Wong uses subtle ges-tural codes o perormance, à la Antonioni,to convey character. At one point, we seeZhang in his workshop, tailoring one o MissHua’s dresses. In a subtle sign o his love, hecaresses the lining o her garment, a moveaccentuated by Wong’s use o slow motion.His love thrives despite sexual denial.Later, towards the end, both the tailor andMiss Hua look downwards; both are humbledand embarrassed by her distressed nancialsituation and his need to collect her bill. Bothhave ‘lost ace’ and hence subtly bow theirheads in mutual shame. Another example o  Below Wong Kar-Wai’s segment The Hand
Related Documents
View more...
We Need Your Support
Thank you for visiting our website and your interest in our free products and services. We are nonprofit website to share and download documents. To the running of this website, we need your help to support us.

Thanks to everyone for your continued support.

No, Thanks
SAVE OUR EARTH

We need your sign to support Project to invent "SMART AND CONTROLLABLE REFLECTIVE BALLOONS" to cover the Sun and Save Our Earth.

More details...

Sign Now!

We are very appreciated for your Prompt Action!

x