Research

4 pages
133 views

Critical Infrastructure for Ocean Research, Report in Brief

of 4
All materials on our website are shared by users. If you have any questions about copyright issues, please report us to resolve them. We are always happy to assist you.
Share
Description
U.S. ocean research depends on a broad range of ocean infrastructure assets—the national inventory of ships and other platforms, sensors and samplers, computational and data systems, supporting facilities, and trained personnel. In order to ensure that essential infrastructure is available for both fundamental research and issues of social importance in 2030, a coordinated national plan for making future strategic investments is necessary. A growing suite of infrastructure will be needed to address urgent societal issues in coming years, such as climate change, offshore energy production, tsunami detection, and sustainable fisheries. This report identifies major ocean science questions anticipated to be significant in 2030, defines the categories of infrastructure needed to support such research over the next two decades, identifies criteria that could help prioritize infrastructure development or replacement, and suggests ways to maximize investments in ocean infrastructure.
Transcript
  T he United States has jurisdiction over 3.4 million square miles of ocean—anexpanse greater than the land area of all50 states combined. This vast marine area offersmany environmental resources and economicopportunities, but also presents threats, such asdamaging tsunamis and hurricanes, industrialaccidents, and outbreaks of waterborne U.S. ocean research depends on a broad range of ocean infrastructure assets—the nationalinventory of ships and other platforms, sensors and samplers, computational and data systems,supporting facilities, and trained personnel. In order to ensure that essential infrastructure isavailable for both fundamental research and issues of social importance in 2030, a coordinatednational plan for making future strategic investments is necessary. A growing suite of infra-structure will be needed to address urgent societal issues in coming years, such as climatechange, offshore energy production, tsunami detection, and sustainable sheries. This reportidenties major ocean science questions anticipated to be signicant in 2030, denes thecategories of infrastructure needed to support such research over the next two decades, identi-es criteria that could help prioritize infrastructure development or replacement, and suggestsways to maximize investments in ocean infrastructure. Critical Infrastructure for OceanResearch and Societal Needs in 2030  pathogens. The 2010 Gulf of Mexico  Deepwater  Horizon oil spill and 2011 Japanese earthquakeand tsunami are vivid reminders that our understanding of the ocean system is stillincomplete.The nation’s portfolio of ocean infrastruc-ture changes over time in response to scienticneeds, investments, and to advances in  technology. However, because of lengthy lead times for planning,designing, funding and buildingmajor infrastructure assets, and because of the long service life of many of these assets (often 25–30years or more), federal agencieswith ocean responsibilities need toanticipate the directions that oceanresearch could take in comingdecades. Some critical pieces of ocean infrastructure, for exampleheavy icebreakers and ocean color satellites, are degrading and will bein need of replacement in comingyears. To assist in planning for thenation’s future ocean infrastructureneeds, the National Science andTechnology Council’sSubcommittee on Ocean Scienceand Technology requested that the National Research Council convenea committee of experts to provideadvice on the types of U.S. oceaninfrastructure that will facilitateresearch in 2030. Building the OceanInfrastructure Inventory A comprehensive range of ocean research infrastructure will be needed to meet growingdemands for scientic informationto enable the safe, efcient, andenvironmentally sustainable use of the ocean. Institutional barriershave inhibited collaborative effortsamong federal agencies to plan for the operation and maintenance of high-cost critical infrastructureassets such as ships, satellites, andglobal observing systems.Establishing and maintaining acoordinated national strategic plan for shared oceaninfrastructure investment and maintenance isessential to build the comprehensive range of oceaninfrastructure that will be needed in coming years.Such a plan would focus on trends in scientic needsand advances in technology, while taking intoaccount factors such as costs, efcient use, and thecapacity to cope with unforeseen events. Overarching Infrastructure Needs The committee identied overarching infrastruc-ture needs based on trends in ocean infrastructure useover the last two or more decades and on the major research questions anticipated for 2030. It focused oncommon or shared infrastructure, rather than equip-ment generally found in the inventory of an individualscientist. The committee expects that research vesselswill continue to be an essential element of ocean  Major Ocean Research Questions of 2030 Using input from the worldwide scientic community, a range of recent government plans, task force documents, research planningassessments, and a review of primary literature, the committeeidentied compelling research questions anticipated to be at theforefront of ocean science in 2030. These research questions fallunder four themes: 1. Enabling stewardship of the environment  Many human activities have impacts on the ocean. With over 12,000 miles of coastline, the U.S. has particular interest in effects onthe coastal ocean. The polar regions, with sensitivity to changes inclimate and sea level, are also a high priority. Increased understandingof the ocean’s physical, chemical, and biological responses to factorssuch as climate change, mineral and energy extraction, shing, waste production, and nutrient pollution could help limit these impacts. 2. Protecting life and property Recent catastrophic events in the U.S. and worldwide have raisedinterest in predicting and limiting the effects of natural hazards suchas earthquakes, severe storms, and tsunamis. Growing concern aboutthe effects of climate change, for example sea level rise and its effecton coastal infrastructure, is likely to drive interest in this researcharea in coming years and well beyond 2030. 3. Promoting economic vitality Traditional uses of the ocean, such as oil and gas extraction, sheries,transportation, shipping, and recreation, are large components of theU.S. ocean economy. Other activities such as aquaculture, wind power, and marine hydrokinetic resources, are poised to become moreimportant over the next two decades. The sustainability of theseresources for future generations is of great importance, as is mini-mizing adverse impacts on the marine environment. 4. Increasing fundamental scientic understanding  Basic research has a long history of producing discoveries thatadvance scientic understanding and that improve economic well- being. Many of these advances eventually lead to an increased abilityto act on societal issues, such as stewardship of the environment, protection of life and property, and promotion of sustainableeconomic vitality.  The committee concluded that the followingactions would help ensure that the U.S. has thecapacity in 2030 to undertake and benet fromknowledge and innovations possible with oceano-graphic research: ã Implement a comprehensive, long-termresearch eet plan to retain access to the sea ã Recover U.S. capability to access full andpartially ice-covered seas ã Expand abilities for autonomous monitoringat a wide range of spatial and temporal scaleswith greater sensor and platform capabilities ã Enable sustained, continuous timeseriesmeasurements ã Maintain continuity of satellite remotesensing and communication capabilities foroceanographic data and sustain plans for newsatellite platforms, sensors, and communica-tion systems ã Support continued innovation in oceaninfrastructure development. Of particularnote is the need to develop in situ sensors,especially biogeochemical sensors ã Engage allied disciplines and diverse elds toleverage technological developments outsideoceanography ã Increase the number and capabilities of broadly accessible computing and modelingfacilities with exascale or petascale capabilitythat are dedicated to future oceanographicneeds ã Establish broadly accessible virtual (distrib-uted) data centers that have seamless integra-tion of federally, state, and locally helddatabases, accompanying metadata compliantwith proven standards, and intuitivearchiving and synthesizing tools ã Examine and adopt proven data managementpractices from allied disciplines ã Facilitate broad community access to infra-structure assets, including mobile and xedplatforms and costly analytical equipment ã Expand interdisciplinary education andpromote a technically-skilled workforce Setting Priorities and MaximizingInvestments Prioritizing investments in ocean infrastructureinvolves choosing optimal combinations of assetsresearch infrastructure. Ships serve as platforms for sample collection, for deployment of remotelyoperated and autonomous vehicles, and as tendersfor instrument maintenance. Shore-based laboratoryfacilities will also continue to be required as anatural extension to ship-based sampling, for analytical work, and for coastal observations.Satellite observations will be increasinglyimportant for the ocean sciences, providing data onvector sea surface wind, sea surface temperature andsalinity, sea ice distribution and thickness, and oceancarbon and ecosystem dynamics.Another critical component is the global array of Argo proling oats, which measure ocean tempera-ture and salinity at varying depths. Expansion of thecurrent network of 3000 oats by addition of novelsensors would further enable study of the ocean’s physical, biological, and chemical processes. Newsensors for oxygen, nitrate, chlorophyll,zooplankton, pH, and carbon dioxide measurementsare currently available or in development.The committee noted the increasing use of autonomous platforms, such as gliders and autono-mous underwater vehicles, with a wider range of sensors. The capabilities of both sensors and plat-forms will continue to improve in such areas aslongevity, stability, data communications, adapt-ability, and access to harsh environments.Continued developments in ocean infrastructureincreasingly depend on innovations in other elds,including engineering and computer science. This isin part due to decreases in funding for high risk,high reward research and for development of novelocean research technologies. To foster innovationand technological advancements in the oceansciences, federal agencies will need to encourage arisk-taking environment for the development of newinfrastructure, which is difcult under the currentsystems of research funding. In situ sensors and samplingtools allow researchers to collectdirect observations of the ocean’s physical, chemical, biological,geophysical, and geological properties. Relatively small andinexpensive versions of biologicalsensors that can replicate today’scomplicated laboratory techniqueswill be essential in coastal andnear-shore environments. New biogeochemical sensors thatenable better observations of thecarbon system, including pH, andmicronutrients will also be centralto ocean science in the future.   providing broad access to data and facilities,fostering collaboration at many levels, and enablingthe transition from research to broader use. Conducting formal reviews of ocean infrastruc-ture assets approximately every 5–10 years wouldhelp ensure the infrastructure remains usefulacross the full range of ocean science researchneeds. Committee on an Ocean Infrastructure Strategy for U.S. Ocean Research in 2030: Eric J. Barron ( Chair  ), FloridaState University; Rana A. Fine ( Vice Chair  ), University of Miami, Florida; James G. Bellingham , Monterey Bay AquariumResearch Institute, California; Emmanuel S. Boss , University of Maine; Edward A. Boyle (NAS), Massachusetts Instituteof Technology; Margo Edwards , University of Hawaii at Manoa; Kenneth S. Johnson , Monterey Bay Aquarium ResearchInstitute, California; Deborah S. Kelley , University of Washington; Hauke Kite-Powell , Woods Hole OceanographicInstitution, Massachusetts; Steven Ramberg , National Defense University / Pennsylvania State University; Daniel L.Rudnick  , Scripps Institution of Oceanography, California; Oscar M.E. Schoeld , Rutgers University; Mario Tamburri ,University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science; Peter H. Wiebe , Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution,Massachusetts; Dawn J. Wright , Oregon State University; Deborah Glickson ( Senior Program Ofcer  ), HeatherChiarello ( Senior Program Assistant, until October 2010 ), Emily Oliver (  Program Assistant, from October 2010 ), WillTyburczy   (Mirzayan Science and Technology Policy Fellow, Fall 2010), National Research Council.The National Academies appointed the above committee of experts to address the specic task requested bythe National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Science Foundation, National Aeronauticsand Space Administration, U.S. Geological Survey, National Institute of Environmental Health Science,Department of Energy, Environmental Protection Agency, Marine Mammal Commission, Arctic ResearchCommission, Minerals Management Service, and the Food and Drug Administration.The membersvolunteered their time for this activity; their report is peer-reviewed and the nal product signed off by boththe committee members and the National Academies. This report brief was prepared by the National ResearchCouncil based on the committee’s report.For more information, contact the Ocean Studies Board at (202) 334-2714 or visit http://dels.nas.edu/osb. Copies of  Critical  Infrastructure for Ocean Research and Societal Needs in 2030 are available from the National Academies Press, 500 FifthStreet, NW, Washington, D.C. 20001; (800) 624-6242; www.nap.edu.  Permission granted to reproduce this brief in its entirety with no additions or alterations. Permission for images/gures must be obtained from their srcinal source. © 2011 The National Academy of Sciences within budget restraints. The committeedevised criteria that could help agen-cies prioritize investments, takingaccount of issues such as whether theinfrastructure can help address morethan one research question, the qualityof the data collected using the infra-structure, and future technology trends. The committee concluded that thedevelopment, maintenance, andreplacement of ocean researchinfrastructure should be prioritizedin such a way to maximize thebenets from the infrastructure. Thistype of economic optimizationincludes consideration of factorssuch as:1. usefulness of the infrastructurefor addressing important sciencequestions2. affordability, efciency, andlongevity of the infrastructure3. ability to contribute to other missions orapplications Federal agencies can maximize the value of ocean infrastructure by following a number of best practices, including efciently managing resources, The 2010 Deepwater Horizon oil spill demonstrated the diverse range of infrastructure needed to provide a timely, integrated response to a disaster. Thecolor map and vectors represents a Naval Oceanographic Ofce ocean modelsimulation, and graphics and tracks represent in situ assets such as drifters,underwater gliders, and remotely operated vehicles.  
We Need Your Support
Thank you for visiting our website and your interest in our free products and services. We are nonprofit website to share and download documents. To the running of this website, we need your help to support us.

Thanks to everyone for your continued support.

No, Thanks
SAVE OUR EARTH

We need your sign to support Project to invent "SMART AND CONTROLLABLE REFLECTIVE BALLOONS" to cover the Sun and Save Our Earth.

More details...

Sign Now!

We are very appreciated for your Prompt Action!

x