Scrapbooking

15 pages
6 views

A K+-selective cGMP-gated ion channel controls chemosensation of sperm

of 15
All materials on our website are shared by users. If you have any questions about copyright issues, please report us to resolve them. We are always happy to assist you.
Share
Description
Eggs attract sperm by chemical factors, a process called chemotaxis. Sperm from marine invertebrates use cGMP signalling to transduce incident chemoattractants into changes in the Ca2+ concentration in the flagellum, which control the swimming
Transcript
  LETTERS NATURE CELL BIOLOGY   VOLUME 8 | NUMBER 10 | OCTOBER 2006 1149 A K + -selective cGMP-gated ion channel controlschemosensation of sperm Timo Strünker 1,2 , Ingo Weyand 1,2 , Wolfgang Bönigk  1 , Qui Van 1 , Astrid Loogen 1 , Joel E. Brown 2 ,Nachiket Kashikar 1 , Volker Hagen 3 , Eberhard Krause 3 and U. Benjamin Kaupp 1,2,4 Eggs attract sperm by chemical factors, a process calledchemotaxis. Sperm from marine invertebrates use cGMPsignalling to transduce incident chemoattractants into changesin the Ca 2+ concentration in the flagellum, which control theswimming behaviour during chemotaxis 1–3 . The signallingpathway downstream of the synthesis of cGMP by a guanylylcyclase is ill-defined. In particular, the ion channels that areinvolved in Ca 2+ influx and their mechanisms of gating arenot known 4 . Using rapid voltage-sensitive dyes and kinetictechniques, we record the voltage response that is evoked bythe chemoattractant in sperm from the sea urchin Arbacia punctulata  . We show that the chemoattractant evokes a briefhyperpolarization followed by a sustained depolarization. Thehyperpolarization is caused by the opening of K + -selectivecyclic-nucleotide-gated (CNG) channels in the flagellum.Ca 2+ influx commences at the onset of recovery fromhyperpolarization. The voltage threshold of Ca 2+ entry indicatesthe involvement of low-voltage-activated Ca v channels. Theseresults establish a model of chemosensory transduction insperm whereby a cGMP-induced hyperpolarization opensCa v channels by a ‘recovery-from-inactivation’ mechanismand unveil an evolutionary kinship between transductionmechanisms in sperm and photoreceptors. Using fast mixing an flash photolysis techniques, we were able to recoroptically the voltage response from intact motile sperm of the sea urchin  Arbacia punctulata . We have chosen the fluorescent ye i-8-ANEPPS asa potentiometric probe ue to its rapi response time, its exclusive stain-ing of plasma membrane an its electrochromic mechanism of voltagesensing. Depolarization an hyperpolarization shift the emission spec-trum of i-8-ANEPPS by a few nanometres to lower an higher wave-lengths, respectively, by a mechanism known as electrochromism 5,6 (seeSupplementary Information, Fig. S1a). This electrochromic shift allowsfor ual-emission ratio measurements 7 ; thereby, fluorescence signals thatare unrelate to changes in membrane voltage are largely eliminate.A suitable pair of wavelengths for the ratiometric measurement wereerive from the ifference between i-8-ANEPPS emission spectra thatwere recore in sperm suspension uner normal conitions (artificialsea water, ASW) an epolarizing conitions (high potassium ASW,K-ASW). The maximum emission of the spectrum was λ max = 566 nm,an the ifference spectrum isplaye a positive an negative peak at theflanks of the emission maximum (~540 nm an ~595 nm, respectively)(see Supplementary Information, Fig. S1b).As expecte from the ifference spectrum, stimulation of ye-stainesperm with the chemoattractant peptie resact gave rise to oppositechanges in fluorescence F 535 an F 580 that were superpose on a persist-ent increase of fluorescence at both wavelengths (Fig. 1a). By taking theratio F 580 /F 535 (R or ∆R, correcte for the control), the steay componentof the fluorescence signal was eliminate. ∆R ecrease in a pulse-likefashion, inicating a rapi transient hyperpolarization, followe by aslower increase above baseline, reflecting a more persistent epolariza-tion (Fig. 1b). We sought inepenent evience that ΔR represents agenuine voltage signal. A istinct electrochromic ye 7,8 , RH414, reportea resact-inuce ΔR signal that was similar to that of i-8-ANEPPS (seeSupplementary Information, Fig. S1c).Voltage signals coul be recore for concentrations of resact thatwere as low as 0.25 pM, an the hyperpolarization signal saturate atroughly 25 nM (Fig. 1c, , g). The hyperpolarization graually increaseover five orers of magnitue of resact concentrations (Fig. 1). Theshape of the voltage signals change with concentration of resact: Withincreasing concentrations, the with of the hyperpolarizing pulse firstbecame smaller an then broaene again — that is, the recovery fromhyperpolarization became slower. Except for very low concentrationsof resact, the cell epolarize after the return from hyperpolarization(compare Fig. 1c,  an i). The epolarization was smaller than thehyperpolarization, isplaye a ifferent concentration epenence anpersiste for at least 10 s (Figs 1, 3e).The hyperpolarization inicates that resact opens a K + -selective chan-nel; alternatively, non-selective cation channels may close, as in verte-brate photoreceptors 9 , or Cl – channels may open. To etermine the ionic 1 Institut für Neurowissenschaft und Biophysik, Abteilung Zelluläre Signalverarbeitung, INB-1, Forschungszentrum Jülich, 52425 Jülich, Germany. 2 Marine BiologicalLaboratory, Woods Hole, MA 02543, USA. 3 Forschungsinstitut für Molekulare Pharmakologie, Robert-Rössle-Str., 13125 Berlin, Germany. 4 Correspondence should be addressed to U.B.K. (e-mail: a.eckert@fz-juelich.de)Received 4 May 2006; accepted 5 July 2006; published online 10 September 2006; DOI: 10.1038/ncb1473 NaturePublishingGroup ©200 6  1150   NATURE CELL BIOLOGY   VOLUME 8 | NUMBER 10 | OCTOBER 2006 LETTERS selectivity of the resact-inuce conuctance, we measure the voltagesignals evoke by saturating concentrations of resact (25 nM) in thepresence of various external K + concentrations, [K + ] o . Resact was in thehigh K-ASW solution, thus stimulation an high K + conitions wereapplie simultaneously. With increasing [K + ] o , the hyperpolarizationbecame smaller an the rate of ecay from the peak ecrease signifi-cantly (Fig. 1e). The sign of the voltage response with respect to the rest-ing voltage (V rest ) reverse at [K + ] o = 62 mM (Fig. 1f), yieling a V rest of –48.1 mV (assuming a [K + ] i of 423 mM — that is, equal to the [Na + ] o ) .  When [K + ] o was lowere by mixing sperm with 0 K + -ASW, the hyperpo-larization was enhance. Substitution of Na + by  N  -methyl-d-glucamine orCl – by gluconate ha no effect on the voltage response (see Supplementary Information, Fig. S1). Together, these results inicate that the hyperpo-larization is cause by opening of K + -selective channels.The changes in fluorescence can be calibrate into millivolts, proviethat the K + channel represents the ominant conuctance uring therise time of the response. ΔR was linearly relate to log [K + ] o (Fig. 1f)— that is, the response isplaye an almost perfect Nernstian behav-iour. The slope of the graph is 6.6 ± 0.4%/57.7 mV or 1.14%/10 mV. Inneurons, in which absolute calibration is feasible by voltage-clamping,relative changes of ∆R between 0.8 an 1.1%/10 mV were etermine fori-8-ANEPPS 6 . Thus, the voltage sensitivity of i-8-ANEPPS in spermmembranes is similar to that in neurons.The calibration allowe us to estimate the maximal hyperpolari-zation (ΔV h ) an epolarization (ΔV  ) an V rest . Given that V m at thepeak of the hyperpolarization equals the K + equilibrium potential (E K ),then V rest = E K – ΔV h . With E K = –96 mV (assuming an intracellular[K + ] of 423 mM) an ΔV h = –52.7 ± 7.2 mV ( n = 6), we obtaine a 0 1 2 340.360.370.380.390.40250 pM25 pM6.25 pM ASWTime (s) Time (s)Time (s)Time (s) a c 0 1 2 34 − 0.06 − 0.04 − 0.020.000.020.00.5 1.0 − 0.06 − 0.030.000.030 1 2 3 4 − 0.04 − 0.020.000.02       ∆    R       ∆    R       ∆    R       ∆    R       ∆    R       ∆    R   n  o  r  m       ∆    R +0.0 0.5 1.0 − 0.04 − 0.020.000.02 bd − 0.08 − 0.06 − 0.04 − 0.02012340.000.020.00.51.0 − 0.08 − 0.06 − 0.04 − 0.020.000.02 e − 0.08 − 0.06 − 0.04 − 0.020.000.02 f 012345670.0000.0020.0040.0060.0080.010Mean number of bound molecules h 01234 − 0.02 − 0.010.000.010.02Time (s)Time (s) g 01234 − 1.0 − 0.50.00.51.0 i 10 − 13 10 − 12 10 − 11 10 − 10 10 − 9 10 − 8 10 − 7 10 − 6 [Resact] (M)0.000.010.020.030.040.050.060.07    F    5   3   5   a  n   d   F    5   8   0    (  a  r   b   i   t  r  a  r  y  u  n   i   t  s   )       ∆    R   m  a  x 110100[K + ] o (mM) ∆ R/p[K + ] = 0.066 (± 0.004) Figure 1 Resact-induced changes in membrane voltage. ( a ) Resact-inducedchanges in the fluorescence of di-8-ANEPPS F 535 (red traces) and F 580 (blacktraces) after stimulation of sperm at t  = 0. ( b ) Resact-induced changes in theratio F 580  /F 535 (or ∆ R, see Methods); 6.25 pM of resact (black); 25 pM (grey);125 pM (green). Inset: signals shown on an extended time scale. ( c ) Changesin Δ R evoked by resact: 2.5 pM (black), 6.25 pM (red), 25 pM (green), 50 pM(dark blue), 125 pM (light blue), 250 pM (magenta), 500 pM (yellow); and25 nM (olive); traces represent the average of six recordings. Inset: Signalsshown on an extended time scale. ( d ) Dependence of the hyperpolarization(closed symbols) and the depolarization (open symbols) on the concentrationof resact. Bars indicate s.d. ( n = 3–4). ( e ) Resact-induced changes in Δ R atvarious [K + ] o (in mM): 4.5 (black), 9 (red), 19.5 (green), 24.5 (dark blue),29.5 (light blue), 49.5 (magenta); and 99.5 (yellow) — average of sixrecordings; and 25 nM resact. ( f ) Relationship between the changes in Δ R andthe logarithm of [K + ] o . Bars indicate s.d. ( n = 5). ( g ) Changes in Δ R evokedby 0.25 pM resact (black), 0.5 pM (red), 1.25 pM (green), 2.5 pM (blue) —average of nine recordings; and 6.25 pM (olive) — average of six recordings.( h ) Dependence of Δ R on the mean number of bound molecules m  . The sperm‘concentration’ ranged from 0.40 to 0.43 pM. Bars indicate s.d. ( n = 4).( i ) Time course of normalized Δ R responses evoked by 0.25 pM resact (grey),0.5 pM (red); and 1.25 pM (green). At 0.5 pM resact, the mean number ofbound molecules m  was 1.2. NaturePublishingGroup ©200 6  NATURE CELL BIOLOGY   VOLUME 8 | NUMBER 10 | OCTOBER 2006 1151 LETTERS V rest of –43.3 mV. The maximal epolarization was ΔV  = 19.1 ± 1.0 mV( n = 6). Thus, sperm maintain a V rest that is significantly less negativethan that of most other cells, except ro photoreceptors; uring stimula-tion, the voltage can maximally range from –24.2 mV to –96 mV.Sperm are highly sensitive; a single molecule of resact evokes a Ca 2+  signal 1 . To extract information about the unitary voltage response evokeby a single molecule of resact, we recore ΔR at low concentrations of resact when sperm cells receive, on average, a single or a few molecules 1  (Fig. 1g). Assuming a Poisson istribution of molecules among sperm,the signal amplitue becomes:  A = anP n . Σ n1 wherein a enotes the amplitue of the unitary response, n thenumber of boun molecules an P  n the Poisson probability that spermboun n molecules. The foot of the ose–response relationship waslinear up to a mean number of boun molecules m   ≅ 1 (Fig. 1h). Theinitial slope a yiele a quantal response of –2.4 mV. At m ≥ 1.5, therelationship starte to become sublinear (Fig. 1h). This fining isremarkable as it shows that unitary responses — evoke by two mol-ecules that might be asorbe at istant places on the flagellum — onot sum linearly.In the single-molecule regime, resact-inuce Ca 2+ signals scale– that is, their normalize time course becomes almost ientical 1 . The voltage signals for 0.25–1.25 pM of resact also scale, inicating that,in this concentration range, the macroscopic response is compose of single-molecule events (Fig. 1i).Stimulation by resact prouces a rapi rise of the concentration of cGMP 1 . To test the hypothesis that cGMP causes hyperpolarization, werecore the voltage responses evoke by release of cGMP from cagecompouns. cGMP an resact evoke signals of similar waveform, exceptthat the cGMP-inuce signal was faster (Fig. 2a). cAMP also initiatea rapi but smaller signal (Fig. 2b). The voltage responses prouce by cGMP were so rapi that a large part of the rising phase was hien in thetime winow between the peak of the flash an the opening of photoshut-ters ( ~ 12 ms) (see Supplementary Information, Fig. S2). We estimate ahalf-rise time of ≤ 6 ms, implying that the voltage response starte witha short elay, if any. The rapi kinetics of channel opening strongly ini-cates that the channel is gate irectly by cyclic nucleoties rather thanby phosphorylation via a cGMP-epenent kinase. The instantaneousopening both by cAMP an cGMP is a hallmark of cyclic-nucleotie-gate(CNG) channels 10 . Most CNG channels are non-selective cation chan-nels that, on opening, woul not hyperpolarize a cell. To rigorously testwhether a K + -selective channel is unerlying the cGMP-inuce hyper-polarization, we recore the voltage response in the presence of various[K + ] o . With increasing [K + ] o , the hyperpolarization became smaller anisplaye a Nernstian behaviour (Fig. 2c). Moreover, the sign of the resact-an cGMP-inuce voltage responses reverse at similar [K + ] o (compareFigs 1f an 2c). These results inicate that the same K + -selective channel isunerlying both the resact- an the cGMP-inuce hyperpolarization.Because both cAMP an cGMP can activate the channel, althoughwith ifferent sensitivity, the voltage response will epen on the intra-cellular ynamics of cyclic nucleoties. Comparison of the time course 01234 − 0.03 − 0.02 − 0.010.000.011.01.52.0 − 0.03 − 0.02 − 0.010.000.010.02       ∆    R       ∆    R       ∆    R   n  o  r  m       ∆    R Time (s)Time (s)Time (s)Time (s) abdc 0.00.20.40.60.81.00.00.51.01815110100 − 0.03 − 0.02 − 0.010.000.01 0.00.51.0 − 0.03 − 0.02 − 0.010.000.010.02 [K + ] o (mM)   x  -   f  o   l   d   i  n  c  r  e  a  s  e   i  n  c   N   M   P  s Figure 2 The K + channel is directly gated by cyclic nucleotides.( a ) Comparison of the time course of Δ R signals stimulated by resact(25 pM, green) and by the release of cGMP from 30 µM DEACM-cagedcGMP (red). ( b ) Δ R signals elicited by cGMP (red) or cAMP (black);average of 15 recordings. Arrow indicates the time of the ultraviolet-lightflash. ( c ) Relationship between the changes in Δ R and the logarithm of[K + ] o . Bar at the lowest [K + ] o indicates s.d. ( n = 3); in all other cases, thes.d. lies within the data points. The dotted line indicates the [K + ] o of 76 mMat which Δ R reversed sign, corresponding to a V rest of –43.2 mV. Inset:cGMP-induced changes in Δ R at various [K + ] o (in mM): 9 (black), 19.5(red), 29.5 (green), 49.5 (dark blue) and 99.5 (light blue) — average ofsix recordings. ( d ) Comparison of the time course of normalized changesin Δ R (green), cGMP (red) and cAMP (black). For better comparison, thehyperpolarizing signal has been inverted. Changes in cyclic nucleotideswere measured with the quenched-flow technique 1 ; data represent means oftriplicates from one experiment. Sperm were stimulated with 25 nM resact. NaturePublishingGroup ©200 6  1152   NATURE CELL BIOLOGY   VOLUME 8 | NUMBER 10 | OCTOBER 2006 LETTERS of the changes in voltage an cyclic nucleoties emonstrate that thehyperpolarization an the increase of cGMP commence at the sametime an rose rapily to a maximum; in contrast, cAMP i not changesignificantly uring the first 200 ms (Fig. 2). Therefore, cGMP is thephysiological messenger that causes the hyperpolarization.In the Supplementary Information, we provie genetic an biochemi-cal evience for a flagellar channel protein that carries all the signaturemotifs of a K + -selective CNG channel (see Supplementary Information,Fig. S3a). The core omain consists of six transmembrane segments(S1–S6). The pore region carries the canonical GYGD motif of voltage-epenent K  v  channels 11 ; the sequence of the pore region is more similarto that of a K + -selective channel from the bacterium  Mesorhizobium loti  than to the pore of non-selective cation CNG channels or weakly K + -selective HCN channels (see Supplementary Information, Table 1). Thecarboxy-terminal omain shows characteristic sequence similarity withthe cyclic-nucleotie-bining omain of CNG channels an other cyclicnucleotie-bining proteins (see Supplementary Information, Fig. S3b).Proteomic analysis by mass spectrometry of membrane proteins frompurifie flagella confirme the presence of 20 pepties, preicte by the clone cDNA fragment (see Supplementary Information, Fig. S3a).Complete functional an structural characterization of the CNG channelwill require further investigation.How oes hyperpolarization stimulate Ca 2+ entry? Chemoattractantpepties evoke a host of cellular reactions 12,13 , many of which, in prin-ciple, coul be involve in Ca 2+ entry. To examine the activation mech-anism, we compare the time course of the voltage an Ca 2+ signals(Fig. 3). The Ca 2+ signal began to rise at or shortly after the peak of thehyperpolarization — that is, when V m starte to become more positiveagain. This result inicates that Ca 2+ enters the cell through voltage-activate Ca  v  channels that recover from inactivation an open againon subsequent epolarization. For signals of the same amplitue, the V m  at which Ca  v  channels opene was similar, regarless of whether Ca 2+  entry was prouce by resact or by the release of cGMP. For example,the resact- an cGMP-inuce Ca 2+ signals of Fig. 3b an c commenceat a V m of –61.1 mV an –60.3 mV, respectively.A istinctive feature that sets Ca  v  channels apart from each other isthe threshol (V th ) at which they open from a close state 14 . The mostnegative value of V th for the Ca 2+ entry was –71.9 ± 8 mV (Fig. 3). This value is iagnostic of low-voltage-activate (LVA) or T-type Ca  v  chan-nels (V th ≈ –70 mV)) 14,15 , inicating that the hyperpolarization removesinactivation from Ca  v  channels an thereby promotes Ca 2+ entry. A time-to-peak of 70–360 ms for the hyperpolarization (Fig. 1c) an a elay of ~200–600 ms for the Ca 2+ entry  1 are both consistent with a time con-stant of 110–450 ms for recovery from inactivation of T-type Ca  v  chan-nels 15 . We provie partial sequence information for a T-type Ca  v  channelfrom the sea urchin Strongylocentrotus purpuratus (see Supplementary Information, Fig. S3c) . At concentrations of resact ≥25 pM , Ca 2+ signals isplay a secon,slow kinetic component 1 . The late Ca 2+ entry procees in parallel withthe onset of a slow epolarization of the cell (Fig. 3e), inicating thatsperm become further epolarize by the late Ca 2+ entry. The slow epo-larization began at V m values ≥–40 mV (Fig. 3e, arrow). The simplestexplanation is that the late Ca 2+ entry occurs via high-voltage-activate(HVA) Ca  v  channels that open in this voltage range 14 . 0.00.51.01.52.0 − 0.04 − 0.020.000.020.04Time (s)Time (s)Time (s)Time (s)0510 − 0.04 − 0.020.000.020.040100200300400500 − 50 − 60 − 70 − 80 − 90(8)(8)(7)(13)[Resact] (pM)0.00.51.01.52.0 − 0.030 − 0.0150.0000.0150.03001234 − 0.030 − 0.0150.0000.0150.030 adbec       ∆    R  a  n   d       ∆    F   n  o  r  m       ∆    R  a  n   d       ∆    F   n  o  r  m       ∆    R  a  n   d       ∆    F   n  o  r  m       ∆    R  a  n   d       ∆    F   n  o  r  m    V   t   h  r  e  s   h  o   l   d   (  m   V   ) Figure 3 Mechanism of Ca 2+ entry. ( a ) Superposition of voltage signals( Δ R, black) and Ca 2+ signals ( Δ F, red) evoked by 6.25 pM, 25 pM and125 pM of resact in sperm loaded with Fluo-4 or di-8-ANEPPS. The peakof Ca 2+ signals has been normalized to the peak of the respective voltagesignals. ( b ) Time course of voltage and Ca 2+ signals evoked by 25 pMresact (from a ). The dotted vertical line indicates the voltage V m at whichthe Ca 2+ signal commences to rise; V m = –61.6 mV. ( c ) Time course ofvoltage and Ca 2+ signals evoked by cGMP; arrow indicates the releaseof cGMP (flash); V m = –60.3 mV. ( d ) Dependence of V m of Ca v channelopening on the concentration of resact. The most negative value of V m  is the voltage threshold V th (–72.3 mV). The number of experiments aregiven in parentheses above the data points. The error bars represent s.d.( e ) Comparison of voltage and Ca 2+ signals on an extended time scale(125 pM resact). NaturePublishingGroup ©200 6  NATURE CELL BIOLOGY   VOLUME 8 | NUMBER 10 | OCTOBER 2006 1153 LETTERS Our results allow us to outline the complete cGMP signalling path-way that is involve in sperm chemotaxis (Fig. 4). When chemoat-tractants bin to a receptor-type guanylyl cyclase, the ensuing rapirise of the cGMP concentration 1 opens K + -selective CNG channelsan thereby hyperpolarizes the cell. The hyperpolarization removesinactivation from LVA Ca  v  channels that are inactivate at rest an acti- vates hyperpolarization-activate an cyclic-nucleotie-gate (HCN)channels. The repolarizing current that follows the hyperpolarizationis probably carrie by both HCN channels an Ca  v  channels. The early Ca 2+ influx via LVA Ca  v  channels controls the swimming behaviourof sperm 1,2 . The late Ca 2+ influx may occur via HVA Ca  v  channels. Arecent stuy has ientifie fragments of two istinct HVA Ca  v  chan-nels in testis of  S. purpuratus 16 . Alternatively, Ca 2+ entry through HCNchannels that are Ca 2+ permeable 17 shoul also be consiere.The ‘recovery-from-inactivation’ mechanism explains several featuresof the Ca 2+ signal. The elay of the Ca 2+ influx 1 is reaily accountefor by the kinetics of the hyperpolarization an the time it takes Ca  v   channels to recover from inactivation. The Ca 2+ signal saturates at lowconcentrations of resact 1 , probably because the hyperpolarization thatis prouce by ≥25 pM is sufficient to transfer all Ca  v  channels from theinactivate to the close state.Our results resolve long-staning controversies of chemoattractantsignalling in sperm. The persistent hyperpolarization that is observein swollen sperm reportely stimulates a rise in cAMP an pH i thateventually gate open the Ca 2+ entry channels 13,18–20 . However, cAMP isnot significantly altere uring the short hyperpolarization in intactsperm, supporting previous stuies that exclue cAMP as the trig-ger of the initial Ca 2+ influx 1,21 . In a similar vein, it is unlikely that thehyperpolarization promotes H + extrusion by voltage-activate Na + /H +  exchange 12  , because the resact-inuce change in pH i is slower an therelease of cGMP from cage compouns oes not evoke an increase of pH i22 but oes hyperpolarize sperm.The signalling pathways of sperm an ro photoreceptors 9 arestrikingly similar. Sperm an ros can etect single molecules anphotons, respectively. Sperm an ros both hyperpolarize on stimula-tion, although the mechanism of the hyperpolarization is ifferent:In sperm, a rise of cGMP opens K + -selective CNG channels, whereasin ros, a ecrease of cGMP closes non-selective cation CNG chan-nels. In this respect, cGMP signalling in sperm is more akin to ciliary photoreceptors of invertebrates that use a K + -selective CNG chan-nel for light signalling 23 . HCN channels in ros repolarize the cellquickly in bright light an prevent the voltage from reaching E K24 .HCN channels in sperm 25 are likely to serve a similar function: they resist hyperpolarization an allow sperm to encoe a wie range of chemoattractant concentrations.In ros, a single photon causes the hyrolysis of thousans of cGMPmolecules. Due to the slow rate of cGMP synthesis of receptor guanylylcyclases, the amplification in sperm is likely to be orers of magnitue cGMPcAMPGTPGCoutin‘Turn’Flagellar asymmetrypolarizationpolarizationpolarization + Stimulation − 42 mVTimeKCNGHCN & LVA Ca v HVA Ca v ab K +    K   C   N   G HyperRe-De-    H   C   N   L   V   A   C  a   v    H   V   A   C  a   v Na + Ca 2+ Ca 2+ [Ca 2 + ] i [Ca 2 + ] i Ligand    V  o   l   t  a  g  e Figure 4 Model of chemotactic signalling events in sperm. ( a ) Binding ofthe chemoattractant to a receptor guanylyl cyclase activates the synthesisof cGMP from GTP. Cyclic GMP opens K + -selective CNG channels,thereby causing hyperpolarization of the membrane. On hyperpolarization,hyperpolarization-activated and cyclic-nucleotide-gated (HCN) channelsand low-voltage-activated Ca v channels (LVA Ca v ) allow the influx of Na +  and Ca 2+ , respectively. Finally, the opening of high-voltage-activated Ca 2+  channels (HVA Ca v ) produce a sustained elevation of [Ca 2+ ] i . Ca 2+ ionsinteract by unknown mechanisms with the axoneme of the flagellum andcause an increase in the asymmetry of flagellar beat and, finally, a turn inthe swimming trajectory. ( b ) Contributions of the distinct ion channels to thevoltage response. NaturePublishingGroup ©200 6
Related Documents
View more...
We Need Your Support
Thank you for visiting our website and your interest in our free products and services. We are nonprofit website to share and download documents. To the running of this website, we need your help to support us.

Thanks to everyone for your continued support.

No, Thanks
SAVE OUR EARTH

We need your sign to support Project to invent "SMART AND CONTROLLABLE REFLECTIVE BALLOONS" to cover the Sun and Save Our Earth.

More details...

Sign Now!

We are very appreciated for your Prompt Action!

x