Documents

39 pages
9 views

12-15388 #21

of 39
All materials on our website are shared by users. If you have any questions about copyright issues, please report us to resolve them. We are always happy to assist you.
Share
Description
Doc #21- BLAG's (1) Response to DOJ's motion to consolidate and expedite, (2) Motion to stay pending decision of DOJ's request for initial hearing en banc, and (3) Motion to Dismiss case # 12-15409
Transcript
    No. 12-15388_________ IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALSFOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT _________KAREN GOLINSKI,Plaintiff - Appellee,v.U.S. OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT, et al.,Defendants - Appellees,THE BIPARTISAN LEGAL ADVISORY GROUP OF THEU.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES,Intervenor-Defendant - Appellant   _________On Appeal from a Final Order of the U.S. District Courtfor the Northern District of California_________ APPELLANT BIPARTISAN LEGAL ADVISORY GROUP’S(I) RESPONSE TO EXECUTIVE BRANCH APPELLEES’ MOTION TOCONSOLIDATE AND EXPEDITE APPEALS,(II) MOTION FOR STAY PENDING RULING ON EXECUTIVE BRANCHAPPELLEES’ PETITION FOR INITIAL HEARING EN BANC, AND(III) MOTION TO DISMISS NO. 12-15409 Case: 12-15388 04/05/2012 ID: 8128952 DktEntry: 21-1 Page: 1 of 28 (1 of 39)  i TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF AUTHORITIES .................................................................. iiBACKGROUND .................................................................................... 2DISCUSSION ......................................................................................... 15CONCLUSION ....................................................................................... 19CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE Case: 12-15388 04/05/2012 ID: 8128952 DktEntry: 21-1 Page: 2 of 28 (2 of 39)  ii TABLE OF AUTHORITIES  Cases  Adolph Coors Co. v. Brady ,944 F.2d 1543 (10th Cir. 1991) .................................................... 8   Ameron, Inc. v. U.S. Army Corps of Eng’rs ,787 F.2d 875 (3d Cir. 1986) ......................................................... 8, 13  Barnes v. Carmen , 582 F. Supp. 163(D.D.C. 1984) ............................................................................... 8, 13  Barnes-Wallace v. City of San Diego ,607 F.3d 1167 (9th Cir. 2010) ...................................................... 18  Bishop v. United States ,No. 4:04-cv-00848 (N.D. Okla.)................................................... 3, 7  Bldg. and Const. Trades Dep’t v. Reich ,40 F.3d 1275 (D.C. Cir. 1994) ...................................................... 13  Bowen v. Kendrick  ,483 U.S. 1304 (1987) ................................................................... 10  Bryant v. Yellen ,447 U.S. 352 (1980)...................................................................... 13 Chadha v. INS ,No. 77-1702 (9th Cir.) .................................................................. 12 Cheng Fan Kwok v. INS ,392 U.S. 206 (1968)...................................................................... 12 Cozen O’Connor, P.C. v. Tobits ,2:11-cv-00045 (E.D. Pa.) .............................................................. 7  Diamond v. Charles ,476 U.S. 54 (1986)........................................................................ 13 Case: 12-15388 04/05/2012 ID: 8128952 DktEntry: 21-1 Page: 3 of 28 (3 of 39)  iii  Dragovich v. U.S. Dep’t of the Treasury ,4:10-cv-01564 (N.D. Cal.) ............................................................ 3, 7 Golinski v. OPM  ,   781 F. Supp. 2d 967 (N.D. Cal. 2011) .......................................... 6 Golinski v. OPM  ,   No. 10-cv-00257, 2012 WL 569685(N.D. Cal. Feb. 22, 2012) ............................................................. 8  Golinski v. OPM  ,No. 3:10-cv-0257 (N.D. Cal.) .......................................................  passim    High Tech Gays v. Def. Indus. Sec. Clearance Office ,895 F.2d 563 (9th Cir. 1990) ........................................................ 4, 8, 19  Hunt v. Ake ,No. 8:04-cv-1852 (M.D. Fla.)....................................................... 3  In re Findley ,593 F.3d 1048 (2010) ................................................................... 17   In re Kandu ,315 B.R. 123 (Bankr. W.D. Wash. 2004) ..................................... 3  In re Koerner  ,800 F.2d 1358 (5th Cir. 1986) ...................................................... 8, 13  INS v. Chadha ,462 U.S. 919 (1983)...................................................................... 8, 12  John v. United States ,247 F.3d 1032 (9th Cir. 2001) ...................................................... 19  Lawrence v. Texas ,539 U.S. 558 (2003)...................................................................... 4  Lear Siegler, Inc. v. Lehman ,842 F.2d 1102 (9th Cir. 1988) ...................................................... 15 Case: 12-15388 04/05/2012 ID: 8128952 DktEntry: 21-1 Page: 4 of 28 (4 of 39)
We Need Your Support
Thank you for visiting our website and your interest in our free products and services. We are nonprofit website to share and download documents. To the running of this website, we need your help to support us.

Thanks to everyone for your continued support.

No, Thanks
SAVE OUR EARTH

We need your sign to support Project to invent "SMART AND CONTROLLABLE REFLECTIVE BALLOONS" to cover the Sun and Save Our Earth.

More details...

Sign Now!

We are very appreciated for your Prompt Action!

x